<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Freshman Political Orientation, 2007 edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fstutzman.com/2007/08/21/freshman-political-orientation-2007-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fstutzman.com/2007/08/21/freshman-political-orientation-2007-edition/</link>
	<description>Thoughts about information, social networks, and privacy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 21:54:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://fstutzman.com/2007/08/21/freshman-political-orientation-2007-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-904</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 02:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/~fred/projects/blog/?p=478#comment-904</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s also interesting to note that those who identified as &quot;Very Conservative,&quot; though never more than two percent of the sample, doubled in two years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s also interesting to note that those who identified as &#8220;Very Conservative,&#8221; though never more than two percent of the sample, doubled in two years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calvin Spealman</title>
		<link>http://fstutzman.com/2007/08/21/freshman-political-orientation-2007-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-901</link>
		<dc:creator>Calvin Spealman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 17:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/~fred/projects/blog/?p=478#comment-901</guid>
		<description>I read this blog as it comes through my reader, but I hadn&#039;t realized you were at UNC, near Charlotte. I&#039;m starting a Python User Group here. i can&#039;t remember any language specifics on your blog, so I don&#039;t know if you&#039;d be interested. Thought i would mention it in case.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;We have a Google Group named CharPy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read this blog as it comes through my reader, but I hadn&#8217;t realized you were at UNC, near Charlotte. I&#8217;m starting a Python User Group here. i can&#8217;t remember any language specifics on your blog, so I don&#8217;t know if you&#8217;d be interested. Thought i would mention it in case.</p>
<p>We have a Google Group named CharPy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ge</title>
		<link>http://fstutzman.com/2007/08/21/freshman-political-orientation-2007-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-899</link>
		<dc:creator>ge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/~fred/projects/blog/?p=478#comment-899</guid>
		<description>Fred,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It&#039;s interesting to compare your results with some percentages that I derived from voter registration data from the Orange County Board of Elections.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In 2000, 48% of new registrants were Democratic, 23% were Republicans, 29% were unaffiliated.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In 2007, 45% of new registrants were Democratic, 18% were Republicans, 38% were unaffiliated.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The obvious winner is the &quot;Unaffiliated&quot; &quot;party&quot;.  I wonder how that correlates with your data since your data doesn&#039;t show any growth of &quot;moderates&quot;.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;BTW, jkd&#039;s definition of &quot;libertarian&quot; is spot on!  People were able to register as Libertarians until 2005 or so.  The highest number of registrations in any year from 2000 thru 2004 was two (2)!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting to compare your results with some percentages that I derived from voter registration data from the Orange County Board of Elections.</p>
<p>In 2000, 48% of new registrants were Democratic, 23% were Republicans, 29% were unaffiliated.</p>
<p>In 2007, 45% of new registrants were Democratic, 18% were Republicans, 38% were unaffiliated.</p>
<p>The obvious winner is the &#8220;Unaffiliated&#8221; &#8220;party&#8221;.  I wonder how that correlates with your data since your data doesn&#8217;t show any growth of &#8220;moderates&#8221;.</p>
<p>BTW, jkd&#8217;s definition of &#8220;libertarian&#8221; is spot on!  People were able to register as Libertarians until 2005 or so.  The highest number of registrations in any year from 2000 thru 2004 was two (2)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jkd</title>
		<link>http://fstutzman.com/2007/08/21/freshman-political-orientation-2007-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-898</link>
		<dc:creator>jkd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 20:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/~fred/projects/blog/?p=478#comment-898</guid>
		<description>also note the several-percentage uptick in &quot;libertarian&quot; identification - &quot;libertarian&quot; being what some conservatives who vote just like other conservatives but don&#039;t want to be identified with them, call themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also note the several-percentage uptick in &#8220;libertarian&#8221; identification &#8211; &#8220;libertarian&#8221; being what some conservatives who vote just like other conservatives but don&#8217;t want to be identified with them, call themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

