August, 2007


17
Aug 07

Where are the PoliCommons?

A special note of congrats to fellow TechPresident contributors – four of whom where featured on the New York Times op-ed page today. Quoting Josh Levy:

Today the New York Times published an op-ed on “Changing the Terms of Debate,” giving “seven people with experience in both new media and old” the chance to weigh in on what “a real new media debate” would like. Included were techPresident’s Micah Sifry, Andrew Rasiej, David All, and Zephyr Teachout. Four out of seven ain’t bad!

While I enjoyed all of the pieces, Zephyr Teachout’s resounded especially. She asks:

I propose a full day of live one-on-one debates on unannounced issues, with no aides to help or reply. Each candidate would be paired with another candidate for seven 60-minute sessions. The candidates would switch off against one another until each candidate had debated everyone else: Mr. Edwards against Mr. Dodd, then Mr. Edwards against Mr. Obama, then Mr. Edwards against Mr. Kucinich, and on down the line. In an eight-candidate field, four debates would be taking place at once.

Each debate would have a live audience and Webcast. All 28 debates would be stored, open to the public, and licensed with simple software tools so that citizens could easily rewatch, remix and share. An ambitious blogger could create “Democrats on immigration,” splicing into one online video the smartest, funniest, most provocative statements from the debates.

The Internet doesn’t just enable cool avatars and the shorter form. It also allows the deeper form: cross-linked blog posts, extensive research, simultaneous screens and raw debate footage that anyone can scan online, at any time. New media are not constrained by the scarcity of TV network time.

This sounds a lot like a Political Commons to me: a funded, independent space that would create and distribute political content for anyone and everyone to remix, rebroadcast and mash up. The commons would act as more than a data store (though a data store of open-licensed political materials would be a good start), it would produce content with light context that would enable remixers to create innovative derivative products. The Poli Commons could provide a Digg-like system for voting and discovering submissions, and awards could be presented to those who make the most innovative content.

Like the source code for voting machines, our national political conversation should exist in a space where we are free to use and remix the content. With the exception of the CNN debates, most everything broadcast on television is copyright controlled. A foundation or effort dedicated to bringing conversation into a more “open” space seems to be idea long overdue.

Update: It looks like Yahoo is going to be holding a mash-up debate; Wired bemoans the mashups as inauthentic, however.


15
Aug 07

Newsweek and more sneaker metaphors

This week’s Newsweek features a cover story exploring the growth of Facebook. Following up his thoughtful piece on the class divide, I thought Steven Levy did a great job with the story. In the article I talk a little about how Facebook’s attempt to reinvent itself is changing the nature of the service; I’ve previously fleshed these thoughts out in a blog post entitled “Where are Facebook’s Early Adopters Going”.

As the Fall semester starts up anew, Facebook’s efforts to distance themselves from the college market grow more clear. Facebook has decided to drop support for classes, meaning that college students will now have to use a substandard third-party application if they want to see their fellow classmates. On a college campus, the browsing of classmates via “classes” was a core “information vector”, and many loved the feature as they learned more about the people sitting next to them. Now that this feature has been summarily executed, students will reap less informational value from Facebook. Granted, it’s a small change, but an important change; while the site clearly wants to distance itself from its core audience, I fail to see why they feel the need to penalize students.

Facebook’s attitude towards college students might be best summed up in this quote from the Newsweek article – it’s a spin job that would make Karl Rove proud: “Facebook did not change college life, but it changed the lives of the early adopters … many of whom were in college.” (Former COO Owen Van Natta). Yow. And as Facebook focuses its efforts on shutting out its core audience and appeasing the blogosphere, am I the only one left shaking his head and wondering? I get that Facebook wants an older audience, but it’s not like you see Nike leaving the basketball shoe market to compete with Florsheim.


9
Aug 07

MicroID IETF Internet-Draft

Peter Saint-Andre passes along the news that the MicroID specification (view the v0.3 spec here) has been submitted as an IETF Internet-Draft. On the MicroID blog Peter writes:

By popular demand, we have submitted the MicroID specification as an Internet-Draft. Eventually this effort may result in publication of an Informational RFC defining the technology. Please send feedback to the mailing list and we’ll update or clarify the spec accordingly.

Thank you to Peter for his hard work in pushing this spec forward.


9
Aug 07

Edu.Software in Facebook

This morning, the Facebook Blog drew attention to Courses++, a user-generated course management application for Facebook. I’ve played around with it some, and my first impression is that Facebook should have let this mature a little before sending attention its way. Courses++ primarily acts as a forum for a class, but the developers unfortunately forgot that classes have sections, so there’s no standard to differentiate my INLS 490 (Sec. 151, Online Social Networks) from the other INLS 490 (Sec 01W, People and Information). I’ll keep an eye on it and hope it matures a little bit.

As I wrote about a few months ago, there’s tremendous opportunity for Higher Ed in Facebook’s Platform. The students are there, the faculty is there, and the existing software in the space leaves much to be desired. How about a course management app in FB that gives me a forum, wiki space, a protected upload directory, administrative priveleges (so I can gatekeep my class), RSSification of everything, and an interface that makes things really, really simple? Of course, in Higher Ed, nothing is that eay, but I can dream, can’t I?

I look forward to seeing other course management apps as they come online; if you are working on one, drop me a line. The course I’m teaching begins on Aug 23, and if you’re working on something cool, I’ll be happy to try it out and potentially use it for my course. If I get a lot of responses, I may begin reviewing FB Educational software apps here – let’s see what happens.


8
Aug 07

Twitter’s Hubs and Authorities

From an interesting new paper from UMBC’s eBiquity team: Why we Twitter.


4
Aug 07

BarCampRDU 2007 off to a great start

After a great party at Tyler’s Taproom last night, and a very early morning, BarCampRDU 2007 is off to a great start. We’ve got well over 150 folks here, the wall is full of interesting sessions, and things are running smoothly. People are loving the espresso catering, which is such a nice touch.

If you’d like to follow BarCampRDU, the tag for the event is “barcamprdu”.

Flickr: http://flickr.com/photos/tags/barcamprdu/
Technorati: http://technorati.com/posts/tag/barcamprdu/

Thanks to all the sponsors, donors, organizers, volunteers and especially Red Hat for hosting!


2
Aug 07

How to fix Myspace

While I certainly spend plenty of time talking about Facebook here at Unit Structures, I’m not averse to other social network platforms, nor am I officially supportive of any platform. All of the fluffy A-list coverage aside, this is a critical moment for Facebook and Myspace. Facebook, as we’re well aware, is on a substantial and hard-earned uptick. Myspace, on the other hand, is growing at a more pedestrian rate, and certainly is not the apple of the press’ eye anymore. Myspace is facing a moment where it must redefine itself as a situationally relevant social network platform, or it will continue ceding its territory to Facebook. Here are a few simple suggestions to get Myspace back on track.

It’s time for a redesign. The Myspace aesthetic that we all love-to-hate has turned from a quirky outlier in Myspace’s success story to a genuine rock around its neck. A redesign that focuses on usability, simplicity and core functionality are certainly in order. Don’t mistake this for a call for an overhaul – Myspace should leverage the experience that users already know, but simply repackage it in a more palatable format. As Facebook has shown, it’s OK to use Ajax to give your users a better experience; the pageviews at the cost of frustrated users simply cost too much. Furthermore, a well-executed refresh would be a nice story, bound to make lots of bloggers happy.

Open the doors to developers. Facebook’s Platform makes sense on many levels, and my favorite reason is that Facebook understands it can’t be all things to all people. In creating the platform, Facebook is allowing users to create applications that answer niche needs, while properly and rightfully allowing developers to monetize on their work. It is a simple ecosystem argument – Facebook’s developer community makes Facebook a better place, and Facebook rewards these developers. It was a happy mistake that Myspace’s CSS was exploited, allowing developers to come in and personalize the space – why didn’t Myspace learn from that? Instead, it has been cutting developers off, preventing them from monetizing, and turning away creative minds who wish to make the space better. Look outside the box and learn from Facebook on this one.

Content, content, content. It’s time for News Corporation to stop looking at Myspace as a churning sea of ad viewers, and embrace Myspace as a full-fledged content distribution network. Think radically here. Put the entire Simpsons back-archive on Myspace. Put the Wall Street Journal into Myspace. Put full-length shows up on Myspace 3 days before they go on the air. And the thing is, this doesn’t seem to be an extremely difficult step; NewsCorp has the content, the rights, and the channel. All they need to do is vertically integrate and give Myspace users millions of new reasons to log back in to the service.

Revitalize the brand identity. danah’s points may have been controversial, but there was truth to her argument. Myspace’s brand identity has been captured by a segment of its userbase, and on top of that all of the sex predator coverage has devalued the brand significantly. It’s time for Myspace to step in and be proactive about its identity. Think it’s impossible? If Wal-Mart can substantially soften its image by stocking organic produce, anything can be done. Leveraging content, new services, and functionalities targeted to Myspace’s ever-aging userbase, there’s a lot Myspace can do to distance itself from the hysteria that surrounds it. In fact, I think a lot of Myspace’s core users would appreciate it.

Find new ways to open the doors to users. If we want to draw an analogy, Myspace is the restaurant/bar that is very popular with its audience, but is failing to draw in the new crowd it so desperately desires (they’re at Facebook cafe down the street). How can Myspace make itself a destination for these people who have latched onto a competing brand? This is obviously a combination strategy; rebranding, new initiatives, openness – but what about mobile, or devices? As it stands, you can only get Myspace Mobile on one phone. Talk about killing a potentially huge market. Myspace needs to look past these exclusives and embrace openness that will bring in a rejuvenated audience.

Finally, the simple stuff. This really should be the first item on my list. Myspace needs to invest in preventing spam and other annoyances that make the user experience regrettable. At the same time, Myspace must bring on a lot more customer support, answer emails, etc – all of the things you have to do to make your customers like you.

It’s always easier to call these things from the sidelines, but I do believe that Myspace is at a critical point in its history. NewsCorp must look at Myspace less as a sunk cost to recoup (the small one-off bizdev deals smell desperate), and more as an ecosystem that needs investment to flourish. However, if that investment doesn’t come, and Myspace doesn’t evolve and develop towards changing tastes, I do worry that we’ve seen Myspace’s peak.