<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook Public Search, New?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fstutzman.com/2007/09/05/facebook-public-search-new/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fstutzman.com/2007/09/05/facebook-public-search-new/</link>
	<description>Thoughts about information, social networks, and privacy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 21:54:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz Lawley</title>
		<link>http://fstutzman.com/2007/09/05/facebook-public-search-new/comment-page-1/#comment-926</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz Lawley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 12:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/~fred/projects/blog/?p=488#comment-926</guid>
		<description>I think the sudden &quot;discovery&quot; of this is due to the announcements that showed up on FB login pages this week with links to where you could tweak privacy settings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the sudden &#8220;discovery&#8221; of this is due to the announcements that showed up on FB login pages this week with links to where you could tweak privacy settings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://fstutzman.com/2007/09/05/facebook-public-search-new/comment-page-1/#comment-925</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 03:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/~fred/projects/blog/?p=488#comment-925</guid>
		<description>I understand the trepidation on the part of facebook users but I wonder if it&#039;s not a bit thick headed. Let&#039;s remember that facebook is part of the internet and the internet&#039;s primary function is to make data accessible. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In the early days of mass internet usage, back when AOL was all the rage and the world hadn&#039;t even heard of in home broadband, it was axiomatic that one did not put anything on the internet that they didn&#039;t want seen by basically the whole world. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Did this attitude change because, if it did, I think a lot of people are deluding themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand the trepidation on the part of facebook users but I wonder if it&#8217;s not a bit thick headed. Let&#8217;s remember that facebook is part of the internet and the internet&#8217;s primary function is to make data accessible. </p>
<p>In the early days of mass internet usage, back when AOL was all the rage and the world hadn&#8217;t even heard of in home broadband, it was axiomatic that one did not put anything on the internet that they didn&#8217;t want seen by basically the whole world. </p>
<p>Did this attitude change because, if it did, I think a lot of people are deluding themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://fstutzman.com/2007/09/05/facebook-public-search-new/comment-page-1/#comment-924</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 02:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/~fred/projects/blog/?p=488#comment-924</guid>
		<description>Yes, I think both sides are a big deal.  I put things on Facebook in part precisely &lt;b&gt;because&lt;/b&gt; they aren&#039;t world-searchable and cached forever.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I don&#039;t put highly private things like bank account numbers and am well aware that it is a relatively public forum, but I do expect Facebook to keep things within the walled garden.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Also, for people who have a personal site and a Facebook site, Facebook should not compete with their personal site&#039;s ranking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I think both sides are a big deal.  I put things on Facebook in part precisely <b>because</b> they aren&#8217;t world-searchable and cached forever.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t put highly private things like bank account numbers and am well aware that it is a relatively public forum, but I do expect Facebook to keep things within the walled garden.</p>
<p>Also, for people who have a personal site and a Facebook site, Facebook should not compete with their personal site&#8217;s ranking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred</title>
		<link>http://fstutzman.com/2007/09/05/facebook-public-search-new/comment-page-1/#comment-923</link>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 17:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/~fred/projects/blog/?p=488#comment-923</guid>
		<description>Agreed.  I don&#039;t really see why it is a big deal either.  It was a big deal when FB leaked your profile w/o telling you, but this is sort of a news non-starter.  Perhaps proof that anything FB enters the echochamber easily these days.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;They also talk about FB outcompeting the identity aggregator sites (Spock, etc).  Those sites are so not in Facebook&#039;s league - comparing them is like comparing a tee ball team against the Yankees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed.  I don&#8217;t really see why it is a big deal either.  It was a big deal when FB leaked your profile w/o telling you, but this is sort of a news non-starter.  Perhaps proof that anything FB enters the echochamber easily these days.</p>
<p>They also talk about FB outcompeting the identity aggregator sites (Spock, etc).  Those sites are so not in Facebook&#8217;s league &#8211; comparing them is like comparing a tee ball team against the Yankees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bertil</title>
		<link>http://fstutzman.com/2007/09/05/facebook-public-search-new/comment-page-1/#comment-922</link>
		<dc:creator>Bertil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 17:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/~fred/projects/blog/?p=488#comment-922</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a big deal for search: after all, isn&#039;t &quot;everything&quot; and &quot;everyone&quot; (at least, most photos) already on Facebook?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;However, it&#039;s context-relevant. Not because things will have to change, but because Facebook tells to people something they understand: you can be found through Google &amp; the little box in the corner, or just the little box --- but they drive them to the Privacy option page, with a grasp on the challenge. This means they can teach more people how important are these features; I am tempted to believe any problem is solvable through this page. . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a big deal for search: after all, isn&#8217;t &#8220;everything&#8221; and &#8220;everyone&#8221; (at least, most photos) already on Facebook?</p>
<p>However, it&#8217;s context-relevant. Not because things will have to change, but because Facebook tells to people something they understand: you can be found through Google &#038; the little box in the corner, or just the little box &#8212; but they drive them to the Privacy option page, with a grasp on the challenge. This means they can teach more people how important are these features; I am tempted to believe any problem is solvable through this page. . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

