<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How many Americans use social networking sites?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fstutzman.com/2008/01/28/how-many-americans-use-social-networking-sites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fstutzman.com/2008/01/28/how-many-americans-use-social-networking-sites/</link>
	<description>Thoughts about information, social networks, and privacy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 21:54:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred</title>
		<link>http://fstutzman.com/2008/01/28/how-many-americans-use-social-networking-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-1098</link>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 20:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/~fred/projects/blog/?p=549#comment-1098</guid>
		<description>@kin &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Yes - Pew is seriously amazing, an invaluable resource.  And they&#039;re remarkably nice, too!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;@david&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;No problem, and I agree.  For Pew&#039;s previous studies, they&#039;ve read lists of what a SNS is, etc.  The ambiguity itself creates methodological issues.  For the US,  that seems like a good way to go about the question, but you don&#039;t know who is active, and it might leave out sites like LinkedIn that *feel* rather different from these youth-oriented SNS (though I would argue there is likely significant overlap between populations, though likely not within margin of error).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thanks for the link to that study, I&#039;ve bookmakred!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@kin </p>
<p>Yes &#8211; Pew is seriously amazing, an invaluable resource.  And they&#8217;re remarkably nice, too!</p>
<p>@david</p>
<p>No problem, and I agree.  For Pew&#8217;s previous studies, they&#8217;ve read lists of what a SNS is, etc.  The ambiguity itself creates methodological issues.  For the US,  that seems like a good way to go about the question, but you don&#8217;t know who is active, and it might leave out sites like LinkedIn that *feel* rather different from these youth-oriented SNS (though I would argue there is likely significant overlap between populations, though likely not within margin of error).</p>
<p>Thanks for the link to that study, I&#8217;ve bookmakred!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Brake</title>
		<link>http://fstutzman.com/2008/01/28/how-many-americans-use-social-networking-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-1097</link>
		<dc:creator>David Brake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/~fred/projects/blog/?p=549#comment-1097</guid>
		<description>Thanks for picking that up - I overlooked that study as it wasn&#039;t primarily SNS focused. Two notes - the survey was conducted in late December 07 - even more recently than I thought. And the question asked was &quot;do you ever use online social networking sites like MySpace or Facebook&quot; - this might overstate things a bit as people might answer yes if they had used one of these and had stopped.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;There are some fairly recent stats from a commercial organization about UK adoption of various SNSes - chiefly about facebook - available here FYI:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://www.scribd.com/doc/513941/The-Facebook-Faceoff-An-Empirical-Analysis-by-Human-Capital</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for picking that up &#8211; I overlooked that study as it wasn&#8217;t primarily SNS focused. Two notes &#8211; the survey was conducted in late December 07 &#8211; even more recently than I thought. And the question asked was &#8220;do you ever use online social networking sites like MySpace or Facebook&#8221; &#8211; this might overstate things a bit as people might answer yes if they had used one of these and had stopped.</p>
<p>There are some fairly recent stats from a commercial organization about UK adoption of various SNSes &#8211; chiefly about facebook &#8211; available here FYI:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/513941/The-Facebook-Faceoff-An-Empirical-Analysis-by-Human-Capital" rel="nofollow">http://www.scribd.com/doc/513941/The-Facebook-Faceoff-An-Empirical-Analysis-by-Human-Capital</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kin Lane</title>
		<link>http://fstutzman.com/2008/01/28/how-many-americans-use-social-networking-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-1096</link>
		<dc:creator>Kin Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/~fred/projects/blog/?p=549#comment-1096</guid>
		<description>Great Stats on Social Networking...thanks for digging up and sharing.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Isn&#039;t The Pew Internet and American Life Project great?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;They have provided some very valuable studies about ourselves and the Internet.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Curious what these numbers will do in 2008.  I predict historic growth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Stats on Social Networking&#8230;thanks for digging up and sharing.  </p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t The Pew Internet and American Life Project great?</p>
<p>They have provided some very valuable studies about ourselves and the Internet.</p>
<p>Curious what these numbers will do in 2008.  I predict historic growth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

