<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Future of Social Software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fstutzman.com/2008/02/06/the-future-of-social-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fstutzman.com/2008/02/06/the-future-of-social-software/</link>
	<description>Thoughts about information, social networks, and privacy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 21:54:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bertil</title>
		<link>http://fstutzman.com/2008/02/06/the-future-of-social-software/comment-page-1/#comment-1103</link>
		<dc:creator>Bertil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 11:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/~fred/projects/blog/?p=551#comment-1103</guid>
		<description>When you write ‹‹ but the difference is these assumptions are being written into software for all of us ›› do you mean that rules are into code, or that by “software”, do you mean our habits, conventions?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I believe both are possible: socially or digitally enforced preference on self-revelation, and that it is the key to the points you are raising. I&#039;m afraid we are locking into the later, and that social software show us how immensely socially complex is the world that we learnt to live in during our education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you write ‹‹ but the difference is these assumptions are being written into software for all of us ›› do you mean that rules are into code, or that by “software”, do you mean our habits, conventions?</p>
<p>I believe both are possible: socially or digitally enforced preference on self-revelation, and that it is the key to the points you are raising. I&#8217;m afraid we are locking into the later, and that social software show us how immensely socially complex is the world that we learnt to live in during our education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Hofmeyr</title>
		<link>http://fstutzman.com/2008/02/06/the-future-of-social-software/comment-page-1/#comment-1102</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Hofmeyr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 12:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/~fred/projects/blog/?p=551#comment-1102</guid>
		<description>A great reminder to focus on the customer.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Given the value of &#039;context appropriate friends&#039; to each utility/site a user signs up to, how effective do you think Plaxo Pulse will be at &#039;being the place to arrange those friends&#039; so you can then decide which network to drag to which site?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Making it as easy as possible to add a group of friends while at the same time not &#039;spamming&#039; them with invitations is another interesting topic.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;To avoid having to constantly accept invitations could it be possible for example that once you agree to be a person&#039;s friend on Plaxo Pulse you then &#039;pre-authorise&#039; them to take that relationship to any site of their choosing? But what happens if they choose a destination you don&#039;t want to be associated with? Would be interested to hear your thoughts on this subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great reminder to focus on the customer.</p>
<p>Given the value of &#8216;context appropriate friends&#8217; to each utility/site a user signs up to, how effective do you think Plaxo Pulse will be at &#8216;being the place to arrange those friends&#8217; so you can then decide which network to drag to which site?</p>
<p>Making it as easy as possible to add a group of friends while at the same time not &#8216;spamming&#8217; them with invitations is another interesting topic.</p>
<p>To avoid having to constantly accept invitations could it be possible for example that once you agree to be a person&#8217;s friend on Plaxo Pulse you then &#8216;pre-authorise&#8217; them to take that relationship to any site of their choosing? But what happens if they choose a destination you don&#8217;t want to be associated with? Would be interested to hear your thoughts on this subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

