<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Best Social Software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fstutzman.com/2008/03/25/the-best-social-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fstutzman.com/2008/03/25/the-best-social-software/</link>
	<description>Thoughts about information, social networks, and privacy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 21:54:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ge</title>
		<link>http://fstutzman.com/2008/03/25/the-best-social-software/comment-page-1/#comment-1168</link>
		<dc:creator>ge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/~fred/projects/blog/?p=574#comment-1168</guid>
		<description>I agree 100%, Fred.  It&#039;s also important that the people to whom we allow selective access &lt;b&gt;not&lt;/b&gt; be able to see which group we have put them in.  If I allow you to see what I post to group X, I don&#039;t want you to know that X == &quot;acquaintances&quot;, not &quot;intimate friends&quot; because you might feel bad about that.  This is a super private categorization that we all engage in.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Your idea reminds me of &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://downlode.org/Etext/Patterns/ptn179.html&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this pattern&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;-- ge</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree 100%, Fred.  It&#8217;s also important that the people to whom we allow selective access <b>not</b> be able to see which group we have put them in.  If I allow you to see what I post to group X, I don&#8217;t want you to know that X == &#8220;acquaintances&#8221;, not &#8220;intimate friends&#8221; because you might feel bad about that.  This is a super private categorization that we all engage in.</p>
<p>Your idea reminds me of <a HREF="http://downlode.org/Etext/Patterns/ptn179.html" REL="nofollow">this pattern</a>.</p>
<p>&#8211; ge</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

