<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Software&#8217;s Curation Era</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fstutzman.com/2008/04/15/social-softwares-curation-era/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fstutzman.com/2008/04/15/social-softwares-curation-era/</link>
	<description>Thoughts about information, social networks, and privacy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 21:54:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevo</title>
		<link>http://fstutzman.com/2008/04/15/social-softwares-curation-era/comment-page-1/#comment-1241</link>
		<dc:creator>stevo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 08:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/~fred/projects/blog/?p=585#comment-1241</guid>
		<description>Abundance is not social. I like that idea. But I do think  abundance has social solutions. That&#039;s why I like mixwit.com so much. They support group formation and discovery within the user community. So they&#039;re letting Reed&#039;s law do it&#039;s thing in a way muxtape does not (at least not yet). Right? Or am I missing something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abundance is not social. I like that idea. But I do think  abundance has social solutions. That&#8217;s why I like mixwit.com so much. They support group formation and discovery within the user community. So they&#8217;re letting Reed&#8217;s law do it&#8217;s thing in a way muxtape does not (at least not yet). Right? Or am I missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://fstutzman.com/2008/04/15/social-softwares-curation-era/comment-page-1/#comment-1194</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/~fred/projects/blog/?p=585#comment-1194</guid>
		<description>cool muxtape and commentary...bricolage, nice.  the situationists would be/are proud. &lt;br/&gt;so, with curation does authority/authorship (re)manifest?  how so?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;hill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cool muxtape and commentary&#8230;bricolage, nice.  the situationists would be/are proud. <br />so, with curation does authority/authorship (re)manifest?  how so?</p>
<p>hill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Young</title>
		<link>http://fstutzman.com/2008/04/15/social-softwares-curation-era/comment-page-1/#comment-1193</link>
		<dc:creator>James Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/~fred/projects/blog/?p=585#comment-1193</guid>
		<description>I think this is right on the money. The idea that we are beginning to feel the need to edit and control the content that we interact with is a natural progression, very similar to the progression we have taken with our privacy. We open up completely and then realize that we need to pull back a little.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is right on the money. The idea that we are beginning to feel the need to edit and control the content that we interact with is a natural progression, very similar to the progression we have taken with our privacy. We open up completely and then realize that we need to pull back a little.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

