<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter, the enterprise&#8217;s third space</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fstutzman.com/2008/08/26/twitter-the-enterprises-third-space/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fstutzman.com/2008/08/26/twitter-the-enterprises-third-space/</link>
	<description>Thoughts about information, social networks, and privacy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:23:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Microblogging &#38; Lifestream: segnalazioni del 03/03/09 &#124; Microblogging.it</title>
		<link>http://fstutzman.com/2008/08/26/twitter-the-enterprises-third-space/comment-page-1/#comment-10198</link>
		<dc:creator>Microblogging &#38; Lifestream: segnalazioni del 03/03/09 &#124; Microblogging.it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 06:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstutzman.com/?p=1231#comment-10198</guid>
		<description>[...] Twitter, the enterprise’s third space  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter, the enterprise’s third space  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adi</title>
		<link>http://fstutzman.com/2008/08/26/twitter-the-enterprises-third-space/comment-page-1/#comment-1994</link>
		<dc:creator>Adi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 06:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstutzman.com/?p=1231#comment-1994</guid>
		<description>enterprise twitter is already working in many organizations with enterprise messaging systems and inbuilt grouping ability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>enterprise twitter is already working in many organizations with enterprise messaging systems and inbuilt grouping ability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the real spokesman</title>
		<link>http://fstutzman.com/2008/08/26/twitter-the-enterprises-third-space/comment-page-1/#comment-1376</link>
		<dc:creator>the real spokesman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstutzman.com/?p=1231#comment-1376</guid>
		<description>everything can become interesting after focusing on it for extended time. But vibrant?? I&#039;m somehow ignorant it seems,  still don&#039;t see the benefit of disposable messages. Funny that corporations take twitter serious enough to worry about identity theft (http://xrl.us/oov4s). lol. Shows their vulnerably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>everything can become interesting after focusing on it for extended time. But vibrant?? I&#8217;m somehow ignorant it seems,  still don&#8217;t see the benefit of disposable messages. Funny that corporations take twitter serious enough to worry about identity theft (<a href="http://xrl.us/oov4s" rel="nofollow">http://xrl.us/oov4s</a>). lol. Shows their vulnerably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catha</title>
		<link>http://fstutzman.com/2008/08/26/twitter-the-enterprises-third-space/comment-page-1/#comment-1371</link>
		<dc:creator>Catha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstutzman.com/?p=1231#comment-1371</guid>
		<description>My commmunications/development group (approx. 8 people) is using Twitter as our own little intranet.  Before we would have these long weekly meetings and go around the table asking &quot;What have you been doing?&quot;  Now we all say what we&#039;re doing on Twitter and it&#039;s working really well so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My commmunications/development group (approx. 8 people) is using Twitter as our own little intranet.  Before we would have these long weekly meetings and go around the table asking &#8220;What have you been doing?&#8221;  Now we all say what we&#8217;re doing on Twitter and it&#8217;s working really well so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indy</title>
		<link>http://fstutzman.com/2008/08/26/twitter-the-enterprises-third-space/comment-page-1/#comment-1369</link>
		<dc:creator>Indy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstutzman.com/?p=1231#comment-1369</guid>
		<description>Enterprise Twitter could look a lot like MIT Athena Zephyr and to that degree I think it&#039;s pretty much a proven model in terms of implementation inside a network. (i.e. I don&#039;t think any of the features Fred has in mind cannot be done.)

And to put a different spin on James&#039; complaint, enterprise Twitter is the saviour of enterprise email, because it takes a lot of the short message traffic out of email, including, probably a lot of the &quot;noise,&quot; be it short, stupid, insipid social grooming, or departmental lunch announcements.

Twitter is just a better place for &quot;X is going on in 20 mins time in Building Y.&quot; Especially if you can reinforce the norm that Tweets are transitory. That was one great value of zephyr, there was no searchable archive, so that kept the channel &quot;instant.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enterprise Twitter could look a lot like MIT Athena Zephyr and to that degree I think it&#8217;s pretty much a proven model in terms of implementation inside a network. (i.e. I don&#8217;t think any of the features Fred has in mind cannot be done.)</p>
<p>And to put a different spin on James&#8217; complaint, enterprise Twitter is the saviour of enterprise email, because it takes a lot of the short message traffic out of email, including, probably a lot of the &#8220;noise,&#8221; be it short, stupid, insipid social grooming, or departmental lunch announcements.</p>
<p>Twitter is just a better place for &#8220;X is going on in 20 mins time in Building Y.&#8221; Especially if you can reinforce the norm that Tweets are transitory. That was one great value of zephyr, there was no searchable archive, so that kept the channel &#8220;instant.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://fstutzman.com/2008/08/26/twitter-the-enterprises-third-space/comment-page-1/#comment-1362</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 16:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstutzman.com/?p=1231#comment-1362</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the response Fred.  I don&#039;t entirely disagree with you and can see some benefit ... if people were using it properly for contextually appropriate messaging.

My fear in enterprising it, is that it would mimic how it is often used in its broad application.  Plus, I think it becomes a presentation issue for a lot of organizations.

For example, at my post-sec, there is no one intranet, but a series of disconnected web sites and then a bunch of stuff built on Lotus/Domino (don&#039;t start me on that :-), so providing an easy-to-access place for people to be aware of group tweets might prove challenging.

I&#039;m not sure you could count on standard users to set themselves up easily to receive tweets.

BTW, ever thought of allowing subscriptions to comments?  I just happened to check back today because I like a lot of what you write about ...

Cheers;
j</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the response Fred.  I don&#8217;t entirely disagree with you and can see some benefit &#8230; if people were using it properly for contextually appropriate messaging.</p>
<p>My fear in enterprising it, is that it would mimic how it is often used in its broad application.  Plus, I think it becomes a presentation issue for a lot of organizations.</p>
<p>For example, at my post-sec, there is no one intranet, but a series of disconnected web sites and then a bunch of stuff built on Lotus/Domino (don&#8217;t start me on that :-), so providing an easy-to-access place for people to be aware of group tweets might prove challenging.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure you could count on standard users to set themselves up easily to receive tweets.</p>
<p>BTW, ever thought of allowing subscriptions to comments?  I just happened to check back today because I like a lot of what you write about &#8230;</p>
<p>Cheers;<br />
j</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred</title>
		<link>http://fstutzman.com/2008/08/26/twitter-the-enterprises-third-space/comment-page-1/#comment-1361</link>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 16:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstutzman.com/?p=1231#comment-1361</guid>
		<description>Sam - thank you!  I hope things are going well over at Workstreamer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam &#8211; thank you!  I hope things are going well over at Workstreamer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://fstutzman.com/2008/08/26/twitter-the-enterprises-third-space/comment-page-1/#comment-1360</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstutzman.com/?p=1231#comment-1360</guid>
		<description>Hey Fred,

Great post! (I love the look of the new blog, fyi). I have written a quick response on the Workstreamer.com/blog and will ping you offline. You&#039;re touching on some hugely important stuff that we&#039;ve been working on. Cheers!

Sam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Fred,</p>
<p>Great post! (I love the look of the new blog, fyi). I have written a quick response on the Workstreamer.com/blog and will ping you offline. You&#8217;re touching on some hugely important stuff that we&#8217;ve been working on. Cheers!</p>
<p>Sam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Metaphor: The Workstream as Subject Only Emails &#124; Workstreamer Blog</title>
		<link>http://fstutzman.com/2008/08/26/twitter-the-enterprises-third-space/comment-page-1/#comment-1359</link>
		<dc:creator>Metaphor: The Workstream as Subject Only Emails &#124; Workstreamer Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstutzman.com/?p=1231#comment-1359</guid>
		<description>[...] distill cutting-edge concepts into laymen’s terms has always been impressive and not surprisingly Fred’s done it again: suggesting we consider Twitter updates to be equivalent to reading subject-only [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] distill cutting-edge concepts into laymen’s terms has always been impressive and not surprisingly Fred’s done it again: suggesting we consider Twitter updates to be equivalent to reading subject-only [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred</title>
		<link>http://fstutzman.com/2008/08/26/twitter-the-enterprises-third-space/comment-page-1/#comment-1357</link>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstutzman.com/?p=1231#comment-1357</guid>
		<description>James, I think these are fairly common criticisms of Twitter, and I have a different take.

The reason I think an enterprise Twitter works is because it doesn&#039;t require extensive mental modeling.  Twitter has two elements - the sender and message, a pattern that users have mastered earlier.

To the context question, this is where I think Twitter excels.  I&#039;ve written about socially shared cognition - how I think that Twitter users are figuring out the rules and context through use.  Instead of front-loading users with rules, the enterprise Twitter could be a simple, free space, one in which the &quot;rules&quot; are figured out inside of networks.

Some networks inside a company might only Tweet about research or interesting links, others might just Tweet about their lunches.  As long as their tweets are within the norms of the group, then that&#039;s fine.  And I might argue that almost all conversation is good in the context of a enterprise Twitter.

What really gets me excited is that, unlike other enterprise products, the Twitter doesn&#039;t require rules, training, or a complex roll-out.  You&#039;d just drop it in, and let the community start sorting it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, I think these are fairly common criticisms of Twitter, and I have a different take.</p>
<p>The reason I think an enterprise Twitter works is because it doesn&#8217;t require extensive mental modeling.  Twitter has two elements &#8211; the sender and message, a pattern that users have mastered earlier.</p>
<p>To the context question, this is where I think Twitter excels.  I&#8217;ve written about socially shared cognition &#8211; how I think that Twitter users are figuring out the rules and context through use.  Instead of front-loading users with rules, the enterprise Twitter could be a simple, free space, one in which the &#8220;rules&#8221; are figured out inside of networks.</p>
<p>Some networks inside a company might only Tweet about research or interesting links, others might just Tweet about their lunches.  As long as their tweets are within the norms of the group, then that&#8217;s fine.  And I might argue that almost all conversation is good in the context of a enterprise Twitter.</p>
<p>What really gets me excited is that, unlike other enterprise products, the Twitter doesn&#8217;t require rules, training, or a complex roll-out.  You&#8217;d just drop it in, and let the community start sorting it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
