<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Serious Privacy Issues with Google SearchWiki</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fstutzman.com/2008/11/24/serious-privacy-issues-with-google-searchwiki/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fstutzman.com/2008/11/24/serious-privacy-issues-with-google-searchwiki/</link>
	<description>Thoughts about information, social networks, and privacy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:23:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Unit Structures &#8211; SearchWiki, Groupthink and Privacy</title>
		<link>http://fstutzman.com/2008/11/24/serious-privacy-issues-with-google-searchwiki/comment-page-1/#comment-4183</link>
		<dc:creator>Unit Structures &#8211; SearchWiki, Groupthink and Privacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstutzman.com/?p=1365#comment-4183</guid>
		<description>[...] I posted about a few of the serious privacy flaws in Google&#8217;s SearchWiki.  Thankfully, there seems to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I posted about a few of the serious privacy flaws in Google&#8217;s SearchWiki.  Thankfully, there seems to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Arthur</title>
		<link>http://fstutzman.com/2008/11/24/serious-privacy-issues-with-google-searchwiki/comment-page-1/#comment-4158</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstutzman.com/?p=1365#comment-4158</guid>
		<description>They seem to be doing quite a bit of live tweaking to SearchWiki. The comments are now hidden until you click on them, which reduces the graffiti aspect a little. The &quot;Learn More&quot; link is also new, I think. 

Re: leaving notes for yourself there is a &quot;see all my SearchWiki notes&quot; option (which may also be new). All of your notes are still public, though.

I find it really surprising that none of these problems were flagged in all of their &quot;bucket testing&quot; and other usability testing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They seem to be doing quite a bit of live tweaking to SearchWiki. The comments are now hidden until you click on them, which reduces the graffiti aspect a little. The &#8220;Learn More&#8221; link is also new, I think. </p>
<p>Re: leaving notes for yourself there is a &#8220;see all my SearchWiki notes&#8221; option (which may also be new). All of your notes are still public, though.</p>
<p>I find it really surprising that none of these problems were flagged in all of their &#8220;bucket testing&#8221; and other usability testing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jessamyn</title>
		<link>http://fstutzman.com/2008/11/24/serious-privacy-issues-with-google-searchwiki/comment-page-1/#comment-4153</link>
		<dc:creator>jessamyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstutzman.com/?p=1365#comment-4153</guid>
		<description>I went to try this after reading your post. Google asked me if I wanted to turn this function on and did specifically let me know that my nickname would be public. Was that not there yesterday? I still think it&#039;s pretty sucky, but differently from the way I was expecting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to try this after reading your post. Google asked me if I wanted to turn this function on and did specifically let me know that my nickname would be public. Was that not there yesterday? I still think it&#8217;s pretty sucky, but differently from the way I was expecting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MIchael Zimmer</title>
		<link>http://fstutzman.com/2008/11/24/serious-privacy-issues-with-google-searchwiki/comment-page-1/#comment-4150</link>
		<dc:creator>MIchael Zimmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstutzman.com/?p=1365#comment-4150</guid>
		<description>Well said.

Today, when I went to vote on a search results, I was presented a &lt;a href=&quot;http://michaelzimmer.org/images/SearchWiki-warning.png&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;warning screen&lt;/a&gt; noting that my actions will be attributed to my account name and viewable by others. This warning doesn&#039;t appear in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8Pl1H0dIXE&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;video&lt;/a&gt; Google originally released showing how to use the product. Has this been added subsequent to the original launch?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said.</p>
<p>Today, when I went to vote on a search results, I was presented a <a href="http://michaelzimmer.org/images/SearchWiki-warning.png" rel="nofollow">warning screen</a> noting that my actions will be attributed to my account name and viewable by others. This warning doesn&#8217;t appear in the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8Pl1H0dIXE" rel="nofollow">video</a> Google originally released showing how to use the product. Has this been added subsequent to the original launch?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michaelzimmer.org &#187; Archives &#187; SearchWiki: Boon for Google, Bust for Privacy</title>
		<link>http://fstutzman.com/2008/11/24/serious-privacy-issues-with-google-searchwiki/comment-page-1/#comment-4149</link>
		<dc:creator>michaelzimmer.org &#187; Archives &#187; SearchWiki: Boon for Google, Bust for Privacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstutzman.com/?p=1365#comment-4149</guid>
		<description>[...] Fred Stutzman agrees, also pointing out that Google has made a curious decision in requiring all SearchWiki “notes” to be public. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fred Stutzman agrees, also pointing out that Google has made a curious decision in requiring all SearchWiki “notes” to be public. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
