Posts Tagged: berkman


12
Mar 09

Media Cloud

Via the Chronicle Wired Campus blog and the Berkman Blog:

Media Cloud is a system that lets you see the flow of the media. The Internet is fundamentally altering the way that news is produced and distributed, but there are few comprehensive approaches to understanding the nature of these changes. Media Cloud automatically builds an archive of news stories and blog posts from the web, applies language processing, and gives you ways to analyze and visualize the data. The system is still in early development, but we invite you to explore our current data and suggest research ideas. This is an open-source project, and we will be releasing all of the code soon.

Here’s a media cloud I made for the term Facebook across the WaPo, NYT and BBC.  I’m a little baffled by the top return at the WaPo, but I see the correlations in a number of these other terms.  I’m looking forward to future iterations of Media Cloud – especially embeddable charts!

MediaCloud

Check out Media Cloud.


5
Feb 09

Legal Analysis of Social Marketing

Bill McGeveran has posted a draft legal analysis of social marketing, to appear in the University of Illinois Law Review.  Bill writes:

I’ve completed a manuscript for my newest journal article, which began life as some posts (starting here) musing about the legal implications of Facebook’s then-new advertising programs, including Facebook Beacon, which notified users’ friends of their purchases.

The abstract:

“Social marketing” is among the newest advertising trends now emerging on the internet. Using online social networks such as Facebook or MySpace, marketers can send personalized promotional messages featuring an ordinary customer to that customer’s friends. Because they reveal a customer’s browsing and buying patterns, and because they feature implied endorsements, the messages raise significant concerns about disclosure of personal matters, information quality, and individuals’ ability to control the commercial exploitation of their identity. Yet social marketing falls through the cracks between several different legal paradigms that might allow its regulation — spanning from privacy to trademark and unfair competition to consumer protection to the appropriation tort and rights of publicity.

This Article examines potential concerns with social marketing and the various legal responses available. It demonstrates that none of the existing legal paradigms, which all evolved in response to particular problems, addresses the unique new challenges posed by social marketing. Even though policymakers ultimately may choose not to regulate social marketing at all, that decision cannot be made intelligently without first contemplating possible problems and solutions. The Article concludes by suggesting a legal response that draws from existing law and requires only small changes. In doing so, it provides an example for adapting existing law to new technology, and it argues that law should play a more active role in establishing best practices for emerging online trends.

This article along with James Grimmelman’s recent Facebook and the Social Dynamics of Privacy, are must reads for scholars interested in the legal implications of information sharing in online social networks.  Both are wonderful contributions from some very right-headed scholars.


7
Apr 08

NYT on the Iranian Blogosphere

Page 3 of the national Sunday NYT featured an interesting article on research being conducted on the Iranian blogosphere by Harvard’s Berkman Center. Featured prominently in the piece is John Kelly, whose research I encountered when he showcased his analysis at the Oxford Internet Institute Summer Doctoral Program. John also demonstrated some of his work here at UNC-Chapel Hill, and I hope he’ll come back and show his great work again. The Times reports:

Over all, a new study by the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School shows that Iran’s blogosphere mirrors the erratic, fickle and often startling qualities of life in the Islamic republic itself. The rules of what is permissible fluctuate with maddening imprecision, so people test the limits.

The full study is available from the Berkman Center’s website.